Sotavasara.net

Q. Another Miscast table, #5-6 result query. Can
the opponent use a Bound Spell or ability which
works like a Bound Spell (e.g. Prayer of Sigmar) if
this result is generated?
A. Yes, bound spells can be cast this way, as can
Tomb King Incantantations, and so on.

Page 121, Bound Spells, last paragraph. Please
replace the entire paragraph with:
‘A character cannot have more than one magic item
containing a bound spell.’

Gilaelin kirjoitti:

Page 121, Bound Spells, last paragraph. Please
replace the entire paragraph with:
‘A character cannot have more than one magic item
containing a bound spell.’

Siistiä. Eli voin sittenkin peluuttaa neljää boundia viskelevää ancienttia, koska spitet eivät ole magic itemeita.

Q. Can a Wizard cast the Lore of Heavens spell, Celestial Shield upon a unit he is attached to? The spell's description states that it can be cast upon a friendly unit that is ‘visible’ to the caster.
A. This may seem counter-intuitive, but the letter of the law says that the answer is ‘no’, as the Wizard does not have Line of Sight to his own unit.

Warhammer FB BRB errata/FaQ kirjoitti:Q. How does a unit on non-square bases (i.e.cavalry) execute a 90-degree Turn manoeuvre?
A. Simple! First Turn the front rank 90 degrees towards the intended direction, rotating the model(s) in the centre of the front rank around their centre. Then do the same with the rear ranks and move them back into contact with the first rank. Because the models aren’t on square bases, this turn will result in the formation changing shape slightly.

Eli maagi ei voi tehdä LOS-spellejä siihen unittiin, jossa itse on? Hä?

Tuhis kirjoitti:EDIT: Wtf?

Q. Can a Wizard cast the Lore of Heavens spell, Celestial Shield upon a unit he is attached to? The spell's description states that it can be cast upon a friendly unit that is ‘visible’ to the caster.
A. This may seem counter-intuitive, but the letter of the law says that the answer is ‘no’, as the Wizard does not have Line of Sight to his own unit.

Eli maagi ei voi tehdä LOS-spellejä siihen unittiin, jossa itse on? Hä?

Cactuscheff kirjoitti:

Warhammer FB BRB errata/FaQ kirjoitti:Q. How does a unit on non-square bases (i.e.cavalry) execute a 90-degree Turn manoeuvre?
A. Simple! First Turn the front rank 90 degrees towards the intended direction, rotating the model(s) in the centre of the front rank around their centre. Then do the same with the rear ranks and move them back into contact with the first rank. Because the models aren’t on square bases, this turn will result in the formation changing shape slightly.

Kyllä tätä odoteltiinkin ainakin kolmen sääntölaitoksen ajan(vitosedikkaa vanhemmista en tiedä kun en ole pelannut). Jos vaikka vaivaituisivat kirjoittamaan mokoman kappaleen jo kasilaitoksen sääntökirjaan.

Q. Are partially screened frenzied units allowed to
declare charges? For example, if I have a unit of
Warhounds partially screening a unit of frenzied
Chaos Knights of Khorne are both units allowed to
declare a charge at the same or different enemy
units they can see?
A. If the screening unit is also declaring a charge
(i.e. they intend to get out of the way), then the
frenzied unit behind them can, and indeed must,
declare a charge as well. If the screening unit does
not declare a charge, the frenzied unit behind does
not have to declare a charge, as it wouldn’t be able
to reach the intended target. If the screening unit
were not to move far enough to clear the way
(because they failed the charge, or if a Fear test
stopped them in their tracks, and so on), then the
frenzied unit behind them would also fail the
charge, stopped by the screening unit getting in the
way.

Amazing Slug kirjoitti: Miten olisi tarkoitus selvittää, pääseekö 'screening unit' 'out of the way'? Se pitäisi olla tiedossa kuitenkin jo chargejen julistusvaiheessa.

Yögobbo kirjoitti: Tuollahan oli jo ensimmäisellä sivulla kysytty samantapaista, eli voitko julistaa chargen, jos edessä on pakeneva yksikkö. Eli voit julistaa chargen, jos oletat välissä olevan pääsevän pois alta. Jos näin ei käy, tulee failed charge.

I Ride in a Dragon kirjoitti:Missile-määritelmä on ristiriidassa High Elf FAQin kanssa, siellä sanottiin että White Lionien taljan "Against missiles only" bonusta ei saa magic missileitä vastaan. Nyt taas sanotaan että ne lasketaan missileiksi, jolloin kaiken järjen mukaan savebonus tulisi saada? Kuinkahan on?

Metallifigu kirjoitti:

I Ride in a Dragon kirjoitti:Missile-määritelmä on ristiriidassa High Elf FAQin kanssa, siellä sanottiin että White Lionien taljan "Against missiles only" bonusta ei saa magic missileitä vastaan. Nyt taas sanotaan että ne lasketaan missileiksi, jolloin kaiken järjen mukaan savebonus tulisi saada? Kuinkahan on?

Ainakin mun kuukauden vanhassa Helffien armybookissa Lion cloak antaa saven "against shooting attacks", niin miten se voi olla ristiriidassa?

Q. Are you allowed to pre-measure potential
distances moved prior to moving units in the
Remaining Moves step of the Movement phase? For
example, when moving a Flyer during Remaining
Moves is it legal for a player to measure 20" to
several different spots on the battlefield to
determine his most advantageous move?
A. Yes, this is fine.